Distribution Methods
Technical Distribution Components
1. Open-Source Protocol Specification and SDKs
MCP is released as an open-source standard by Anthropic
Developers can access the protocol specification and SDKs through Anthropic's repositories
The open-source nature enables widespread adoption and community contributions
Language-specific SDKs facilitate implementation across different technology stacks
2. MCP Client-Server Architecture
MCP Clients: Components that connect directly to AI models
Examples: Claude, Tempo, Windsurf, Cursor
In healthcare: Provider-facing interfaces for clinicians or patient-facing applications
MCP Servers: Lightweight programs that expose specific capabilities
Translate between MCP protocol and actual services/tools
Healthcare companies develop MCP servers that expose FHIR APIs, clinical tools, and medical databases
MCP Hosts: Programs like Claude Desktop, IDEs, or other AI tools that need external data
3. Local MCP Server Support
Claude Desktop apps provide local MCP server support
Enables testing and development without cloud deployment
Particularly important for healthcare applications with sensitive data
Allows developers to test integrations locally before deploying to production
4. Pre-Built MCP Servers
Open-source repositories of MCP servers for popular enterprise systems
Examples include connectors for Google Drive, Slack, GitHub, Git, Postgres, and Puppeteer
Healthcare-specific connectors for EHR systems, FHIR databases, and clinical tools
Reduces development time by providing ready-to-use components
5. Healthcare-Specific Protocol Extensions (HMCP)
Healthcare Model Context Protocol (HMCP) is an industry-specific profile of MCP
Provides alignment with national standards like FHIR U.S. Core
Includes terminology normalization across SNOMED, LOINC, and RxNorm
Offers risk scoring to block unsafe or out-of-scope requests in real time
Includes specialty plug-ins (e.g., DICOM for radiology, VCF parsing for genomics)
Distribution Channels and Ecosystem
1. Claude for Work Integration
Enterprise customers can access MCP through Claude for Work
Testing MCP servers locally for internal systems and datasets
Developer toolkits for deploying remote production MCP servers
Organization-wide deployment capabilities
2. Desktop Application Distribution
Claude Desktop app as an entry point for MCP adoption
Pre-built MCP servers available through desktop application
Local testing and development environment
Particularly useful for healthcare developers working with sensitive data
3. Development Platform Integrations
Integration with popular development platforms:
Zed: Fast, collaborative code editor
Replit: Online platform for writing and running code
Codeium: AI coding assistant
Sourcegraph: Code search and intelligence platform
Enables AI agents to better understand context around coding tasks
Facilitates development of healthcare-specific applications
4. Enterprise Software Partnerships
Microsoft has embraced MCP in Copilot Studio
Allows enterprise users to add AI apps and agents via MCP with minimal configuration
Integration with Visual Studio Code for development workflows
Enterprise software vendors creating MCP-compatible connectors
5. Healthcare Platform Integrations
EHR vendors developing MCP connectors for their systems
FHIR API providers offering MCP-compatible interfaces
Clinical decision support systems integrating with MCP
Healthcare data exchange networks supporting MCP for interoperability
Implementation and Adoption Approach
1. Phased Implementation Strategy
Start with low-risk use cases (note generation, lab summarization)
Apply "least privilege" access principles
Introduce audit transparency
Measure impact on documentation time, alert quality, length of stay, safety metrics
Expand to additional use cases
2. Developer Resources and Documentation
Quickstart guides for building first MCP server
Comprehensive documentation for healthcare-specific implementations
Code examples and reference implementations
Community forums and support channels
3. Open Community Collaboration
Collaborative, open-source project and ecosystem
Contributions from developers across the healthcare industry
Shared best practices and implementation patterns
Continuous improvement through community feedback
Healthcare-Specific Distribution Considerations
1. FHIR Integration
MCP servers exposing FHIR APIs in a standardized way
Alignment with FHIR resources (Patient, Medication, Condition, etc.)
Support for FHIR-based prior authorization packets
Integration with FHIR-compliant patient portals
2. Security and Compliance
End-to-end encryption using TLS 1.3
OAuth 2.0 scopes mapped to specific clinical roles
Break-glass overrides with automated tagging
Immutable logs of all data requests and responses
Data minimization principles
Consent filtering following state and federal laws
3. Clinical Workflow Integration
Integration with documentation workflows
Support for triage and clinical decision support
Prior authorization streamlining
Clinical alerts and early warning systems
Hospital operations optimization
4. Implementation Timeline
Integration cycles measured in days, not months
Rapid deployment compared to traditional healthcare integrations
Incremental adoption approach
Continuous improvement based on clinical feedback
Distribution Success Metrics
1. Technical Metrics
Number of MCP server implementations
Diversity of healthcare systems integrated
Performance metrics (response time, reliability)
Security and compliance audit results
2. Clinical Impact Metrics
Reduction in documentation time
Improvement in clinical alert specificity and sensitivity
Time saved in prior authorization processes
Enhanced patient care coordination
3. Adoption Metrics
Number of healthcare organizations implementing MCP
Variety of use cases deployed
User satisfaction scores
Integration with existing clinical workflows
4. Ecosystem Growth
Number of healthcare-specific MCP servers available
Community contributions to open-source repositories
Third-party developer adoption
EHR vendor support and integration
Last updated
Was this helpful?